Editorial: On the Commodification of Education, Evasive Tactics of UISU, and the Rest of Us

Education is the bedrock of any progressive society—it is the catalyst for socio-economic development, technological advancement, and cultural enrichment. It is the avenue through which individuals gain the knowledge, skills, and values necessary to contribute meaningfully to their communities and the world at large. The value of education transcends the classroom; it influences every aspect of human life from individual prosperity to national growth.

Historically, education has played a pivotal role in societal transformation. Investment in education has been a transformative force for many countries around the world, bringing about remarkable economic growth, social progress, and technological innovation. For instance, South Korea, once a war-torn nation with limited resources, has become a global economic powerhouse through substantial investments in its education system. By prioritizing education, South Korea dramatically improved literacy rates, nurtured a highly skilled workforce, and spurred rapid industrialization and technological advancements.

Similarly, Finland’s commitment to high-quality education has produced one of the world’s most equitable and effective school systems, driving social mobility and innovation. Singapore’s strategic focus on education and continuous skill development has also propelled it from a developing nation to a leading global financial and technological hub. These examples emphasize the profound impact that investing in education can have, which is, turning national challenges into opportunities for sustainable development and prosperity. It empowers individuals by providing them with the tools to achieve their full potential, promoting equality and bridging socio-economic gaps.

In essence, education is not just a personal good but a public one. A well-educated populace is the backbone of a vibrant democracy. It builds a community of informed and engaged citizens, who are capable of critical thinking and innovation.

Where Does Nigeria Stand?
In Nigeria, where the disparities in wealth and opportunity are stark, education remains one of the few viable paths for many to achieve upward mobility. Universities, like the University of Ibadan, play important roles in this regard—they offer quality education at relatively affordable rates. However, this delicate balance is now at risk, as the university management’s decision to increase fees raises critical concerns about the future of accessible education in Nigeria.

Given its impact, the funding of education is a paramount responsibility of the government. Investing in education is investing in the future; it is a strategic decision that yields long-term benefits for the nation as a whole. The provision of free and quality education at all levels should be viewed as a social investment rather than a financial burden.

Government funding for education ensures equitable access, reducing the disparities that arise from socio-economic differences. When education is adequately funded, it can cater to the needs of all students, regardless of their background, thereby promoting inclusivity and diversity especially as evidenced in Nigeria. Moreover, well-funded educational institutions can attract and retain high-quality teachers, provide up-to-date learning materials, and maintain a conducive learning environment.

In Nigeria, the constitution mandates the government to fund education at all levels. The 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, under Chapter II, Section 18, explicitly states that “government shall direct its policy towards ensuring that there are equal and adequate educational opportunities at all levels.” This provision stressed the importance placed on education and the duty of the government to uphold it.

At the University of First and Best
Despite constitutional mandates, recent trends indicate a worrying shift towards the commodification of education, exemplified by the increment of fees by over 100% for students at the University of Ibadan. This move threatens to undermine the accessibility and affordability of education, placing it out of reach for many students from low-income families.

The justification provided by the Nigerian government and the University of Ibadan management for the fee hike is utterly unjustifiable when juxtaposed with the blatant spendthriftness and flamboyancy of government officials. It is evident, beyond reasonable doubt, that Nigeria possesses ample financial resources to sufficiently fund qualitative education, as demonstrated by the lavish lifestyles and excessive expenditures of those in power. The government’s claim of insufficient funds rings hollow, especially when considering their readiness to bankroll a phoney student loan scheme.

The introduction of student loans by the government, being touted as the solution to the funding crisis in education, is merely shifting the burden from the government to the individual, exacerbating inequality and entrenching generational poverty. The United States, often cited as the model for student loan systems, provides a cautionary tale.

In the U.S., student loans have led to a crisis of epic proportions. According to data from the Federal Reserve, American student loan debt surpassed $1.7 trillion in 2021, with millions of borrowers struggling to make repayments. This debt burden hampers economic mobility, delays life milestones such as home ownership and starting families, and perpetuates financial stress across generations. Rather than liberating students, such loans often trap them in a cycle of indebtedness that can take decades to escape.

The University of Ibadan Students’ Union (UISU) has been evasive in addressing this critical issue, opting instead for superficial measures that fail to tackle the root causes of the problem. Amidst this crisis, the role of the student unions becomes critical. They are supposedly the vanguard in the fight to protect students’ rights and ensure that education remains accessible. However, the University of Ibadan Students’ Union (UISU) has exhibited evasive and counterproductive tactics that undermine this mission.

Under the administration of the outgone Tobiloba Samson “Host,” the UISU saw a deterioration in its effectiveness. The Congress, a vital instrument of student representation and decision-making, was systematically bastardized. Decisions made by the Congress that could have preempted the fee increment were either edited or misinterpreted, effectively stifling student mobilization and resistance.

The current leadership under Aweda Bolaji “Oloye” appears to be following a similar path. It is disheartening to note that after several months, the Union recently announced that they “are still trying to get the attention of the University management.” This lack of urgency and decisive action is troubling, especially in the face of such a significant threat to students’ right to education.

As a body vested with the power to champion student’s concerns, the leadership of the UISU, the executives and the SRC, must advocate fiercely for the rights of students, taking more practical democratic action to resist this attack on public education. Evasive tactics and half-measures are insufficient; what is needed is a resolute stance against the commodification of education and a call for substantial government funding.

The response from the general student body has been equally disappointing. The fight against the commodification of education is not one that can be won by a few individuals; it requires a collective effort. History has shown us that when students unite and raise their voices, change can happen. The 2008 revolt against the commercialization of education at the University of Ibadan testifies to this power.

The current economic situation in Nigeria makes the fee increase particularly unjust and insensitive. Many students are already struggling to make ends meet, and an increase in fees could push higher education beyond their reach. This is not just an economic issue; it is a matter of social justice. Access to education should not be determined by one’s financial status.

In conclusion, we must be cognizant of the sacrosanct fact that education is a right, not a privilege. It is the cornerstone of a just and equitable society. As we face this challenge, we must remember the words of Nelson Mandela: “Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.” Let us wield this weapon wisely, ensuring that it remains accessible to all, for the betterment of our society and the empowerment of future generations.

The University of Ibadan Students’ Union must rise to the occasion and adopt a more proactive and transparent approach in defending students’ rights. The broader student body must also recognize their collective power and responsibility to resist policies that threaten their access to education.

Education is a collective good that requires collective action. Parents, alumni, civil society organizations, and the general public must unite in advocating for policies that ensure equitable access to quality education. Public pressure and sustained advocacy can compel the government to prioritize education and fulfil its constitutional duties.